RHFRHF Impact Landscape

ResearchHub Foundation Science Radar

Use Trending Science signals as a source-linked starting point

Latest Science Radar helps people and compatible agents discover public science conversations worth reviewing. These workflows explain the right starting point, what to verify, and what Radar is not designed to decide.

Research intelligence

Identify emerging science conversations worth reviewing

Use the Latest Science Radar to turn broad questions about emerging science into a source-linked review queue.

For: Research teams, analysts, strategy groups, and science scouts.

Explore this workflow

Science communications

Add public coverage context to science communication planning

Use source-linked Trending Science signals to understand the public conversation before drafting an explainer, newsroom brief, or stakeholder update.

For: Science communicators, editorial teams, public-information groups, and research organizations.

Explore this workflow

Funder and portfolio context

Add external science-attention context to portfolio review

Use Radar as one public input when a funder, nonprofit, or research program is considering the broader conversation around a science topic.

For: Funders, foundation teams, portfolio managers, nonprofit research programs, and advisory groups.

Explore this workflow

Policy and program horizon scanning

Horizon-scan public science discussion for programs and policy

Use the Radar to identify public science conversations that may merit background research in a program, policy, or nonprofit planning cycle.

For: Policy teams, nonprofit research programs, advocacy groups, and public-interest analysts.

Explore this workflow

AI research agents

Give research agents a governed Trending Science workflow

Connect a compatible agent to Impact MCP for read-only discovery and retrieval of the published public Radar projection.

For: People configuring Codex, Claude, or another MCP-compatible research agent.

Explore this workflow

The shared evidence boundary

Radar attention labels describe public coverage and recency—not scientific quality, clinical efficacy, policy impact, funding availability, or strategic fit. Read each full signal and its retained source links; validate material or time-sensitive claims against the appropriate primary sources.