Browse the public Radar
Review the public Radar as a contextual signal, then trace retained source links and compare them with the organization’s own strategy, due diligence, and domain expertise.
Open Latest Science Radar
RHF Impact LandscapeFunder and portfolio context
Add external science-attention context to portfolio review
Use Radar as one public input when a funder, nonprofit, or research program is considering the broader conversation around a science topic.
Designed for: Funders, foundation teams, portfolio managers, nonprofit research programs, and advisory groups.
Use Impact MCP when configured
A configured agent can retrieve a reproducible set of source-linked public signals for a named topic, without accessing account data or private portfolio information.
Read the MCP connection guideQuestions this workflow can help frame
- What public science conversations provide context for a topic in our portfolio review?
- Which emerging areas should our team investigate further before a planning discussion?
- What coverage should we read before characterizing the external attention around a research area?
A responsible workflow
- 1
Define the decision context
Identify the research area and the specific planning question; Radar is context, not a recommendation engine.
- 2
Collect public signals
Use the Radar or authenticated MCP search to form a source-linked reading list.
- 3
Compare with internal evidence
Evaluate public coverage alongside approved portfolio data, expert input, and the organization’s own criteria.
- 4
Record uncertainty
State what the public sources indicate and what still requires due diligence, especially for time-sensitive or high-stakes decisions.
What this does not establish
Radar does not identify funding opportunities, rank grants, recommend investments, or assess strategic fit. It exposes only the published public projection.